Game entry
Tron 2.0
2003 · FPS, Action RPG, Racing · PC, Mac, Xbox · MacPlay
After 122 duels settled by the community, Tron 2.0 stands no. 3,377 among the best video games of all time on GameForever, with 1,436 ELO points and 37% of wins. Measured against its own family, it climbs to no. 87 out of 127 (2003).
World rank
no. 3,377
ELO score
1,436
Wins
37%
Duels played
122
About Tron 2.0
An unknown viral agent threatens the future of computer systems worldwide. Countermeasure programs have scanned the system and have wrongly identified you as the virus source. Your mission is to prevent the sinister conspiracy that threatens to corrupt one reality, and forever transform another.
Over 35 levels of challenging gameplay -- Race at the speed of light, fight off computer Viruses and engage in violent digital combat.
ELO progression
Score moved from 1,500 to 1,436 ELO points over the last 170 days.
Head-to-head
Direct record on the most played match-ups.
- against Half-Life 2: Lost Coast 0% 2 duels played · 261 points behind
- against Halo 4 50% 2 duels played · 70 points behind
- against Star Wars: Knights of the Old Republic 0% 2 duels played · 402 points behind
- against Fallout 4 0% 2 duels played · 296 points behind
- against The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0% 2 duels played · 386 points behind
In the same genre
All FPS games →Keep exploring
Around this spot
The games Tron 2.0 sits between in the world ranking.
More games from MacPlay
Released in 2003
The standing
Where Tron 2.0 ranks
The world rank mixes every family of games. Here is where Tron 2.0 stands in each of the ones it belongs to. Its best standing, all families considered: 87 out of 127 (2003).
| Ranking | Position | Games competing |
|---|---|---|
| World ranking | 3,377 | 5,035 |
| FPS | 309 | 451 |
| 2000s | 905 | 1,308 |
| 2003 | 87 | 127 |
The community
The debate
0 comments
Posting requires an account: log in or sign up.
The debate is yours to open.
Nobody has spoken up about this game yet. Say what it's worth, and the thread starts here.
See the whole Tron 2.0 debate →