Street Fighter III 2nd Impact: Giant Attack cover art

Game entry

Street Fighter III 2nd Impact: Giant Attack

1997 · Fighting, Arcade · Dreamcast, Arcade · Capcom

Street Fighter III 2nd Impact: Giant Attack is listed in the GameForever catalogue but not in the duel pool: this game is never offered for a vote, its 1,500 points are never at stake and it does not appear in the world ranking. Its entry and its debate stay open.

World rank

ELO score

1,500

Wins

Duels played

0

The duel pool gathers the best-known titles of the catalogue, cover included, so that every match-up stays meaningful. It is recalculated with every catalogue update: this game may join it later. How a game enters the duels →

About Street Fighter III 2nd Impact: Giant Attack

2nd Impact brought back all the characters from the first game and introduced two new ones: Hugo and Urien. Yang, who was an alternate version of Yun in the first game, became his own character with his own set of special moves and super arts. Akuma also returned as a secret computer-controlled challenger and selectable character. Thus the playable character roster increased to 14. In addition to the regular Akuma, a non-playable computer-controlled version named "Shin Akuma" also appears in the single-player mode.

ELO progression

This game does not take part in duels: its score never moves, so there is no history to plot.

Head-to-head

As this game is never offered in duels, it has no match-up to its name.

In the same genre

All Fighting games →
  1. 48 Super Smash Bros. Melee2001 · Fighting 1,878
  2. 98 Street Fighter III: 3rd Strike1999 · Fighting 1,838
  3. 101 SoulCalibur1998 · Fighting 1,837
  4. 133 Tekken 72017 · Fighting 1,825
  5. 134 Guilty Gear: Strive2021 · Fighting 1,825

Keep exploring

The community

The debate

0 comments

Posting requires an account: log in or sign up.

The debate is yours to open.

Nobody has spoken up about this game yet. Say what it's worth, and the thread starts here.

See the whole Street Fighter III 2nd Impact: Giant Attack debate →