Game entry
Safecracker: The Ultimate Puzzle Adventure
2006 · Point-and-click, Strategy, Puzzle, Adventure · PC, Wii · The Adventure Company
Safecracker: The Ultimate Puzzle Adventure is listed in the GameForever catalogue but not in the duel pool: this game is never offered for a vote, its 1,500 points are never at stake and it does not appear in the world ranking. Its entry and its debate stay open.
World rank
–
ELO score
1,500
Wins
–
Duels played
0
The duel pool gathers the best-known titles of the catalogue, cover included, so that every match-up stays meaningful. It is recalculated with every catalogue update: this game may join it later. How a game enters the duels →
About Safecracker: The Ultimate Puzzle Adventure
As an expert safecracker, you are hired by the wealthy family of a recently deceased to search his mansion for his last will and testament. Duncan W. Adams was an avid safe collector and an 'eccentric,' to say the least. Adams has hidden the deed to his vast fortunes in one of 35 safes. You must crack them all using hints scattered throughout his extravagant mansion. The stakes are high. Use your expertise, wits, and puzzle solving skills to earn your paycheck!
A challenging puzzle adventure game with 35 unique safes to crack.
Many creative, clever, and truly unique puzzles.
Decipher unexpected clues inside each safe that will help you open the others, ultimately leading you to the master safe.
Multiple difficulty levels to challenge all types of puzzle enthusiasts.
Explore a magnificent mansion with 30 lavish, intriguing, and precisely-detailed rooms.
ELO progression
This game does not take part in duels: its score never moves, so there is no history to plot.
Head-to-head
As this game is never offered in duels, it has no match-up to its name.
The community
The debate
0 comments
Posting requires an account: log in or sign up.
The debate is yours to open.
Nobody has spoken up about this game yet. Say what it's worth, and the thread starts here.
See the whole Safecracker: The Ultimate Puzzle Adventure debate →